The IAR Journal of Medical Science employs a robust peer review process to uphold the quality and credibility of the research it publishes. All submissions undergo a meticulous evaluation by experts in the relevant fields before acceptance for publication. The journal operates through a double-blind peer review mode, where both the authors' and reviewers' identities remain confidential to ensure objectivity and impartiality.
While maintaining anonymity between authors and reviewers, the IAR Journal of Medical Science prioritizes transparency in peer review. Authors receive constructive feedback from reviewers to enhance the quality of their manuscripts. The journal fosters open communication among authors, reviewers, and editors to promote transparency and accountability throughout the review process.
Reviewers play a pivotal role in upholding the quality and credibility of research published in the IAR Journal of Medical Science.
Reviewers meticulously evaluate assigned manuscripts, leveraging their expertise to offer constructive feedback on clarity, significance, methodology, and interpretation of the research. They assess the originality and contribution of the manuscript to the medical field and identify potential ethical concerns or conflicts of interest. Based on their thorough analysis, reviewers provide recommendations to the editor regarding manuscript suitability for publication.
The IAR Journal of Medical Science acknowledges the invaluable contributions of reviewers to the peer review process. Reviewers are recognized through the acknowledgment section in published articles they review. They also receive a certificate of recognition for their service to the journal and their names are included in the journal's reviewer database and website.
Reviewers receive a 25% waiver on publication fees for their manuscript submissions with the iARCON Group. Additionally, they enjoy a 50% waiver on all conferences and workshops organized by iARCON.
The IAR Journal of Medical Science invites experienced researchers and professionals in medical sciences to apply as reviewers.
Interested individuals can submit their application through the Apply for Reviewer page or via email to applications@iarcon.org. The application should include their expertise, qualifications, and publications for review by the editorial board, which evaluates applications based on relevant field expertise and experience.
Reviewers receive comprehensive guidance and support throughout the peer review process. They are provided access to detailed reviewer guidelines outlining their responsibilities and expected role. Training sessions and workshops on effective peer review practices are available to facilitate the review process. The editorial office promptly addresses any questions or concerns, and reviewers receive continuous feedback and recognition for their contributions to the journal.
The IAR Journal of Medical Science highly values the expertise and dedication of its reviewers in maintaining scholarly publishing standards. By adhering to these guidelines, reviewers significantly contribute to advancing scientific knowledge and upholding academic integrity in medical sciences.
