Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
928 Views
486 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 2 Issue 1 (Jan-June, 2022) | Pages 1 - 6
Effects of Different Storage Methods on Proximate Compositions of Smoked Marine Fishes
 ,
 ,
1
Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
2
Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, Rivers State University, Nkpolu-Oroworulwo, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Jan. 6, 2022
Revised
Feb. 22, 2022
Accepted
March 11, 2022
Published
April 27, 2022
Abstract

Effects of different preservation methods on the proximate composition of some smoked marine fishes (Ethmalosa fimbriata- Bonga; Pseudotolithus enlongatus- Croaker; Mugil cephalus –Mullet and Lutjanus goreensis –Red Snapper)  smoked with Improved NIOMR and Half Drum Kilns were carried out. The fishes were purchased from Creek Road Market in Port Harcourt.  Each of the four fish species was randomly assigned to the two kilns in a completely randomized design replicated thrice. The smoked fish samples were stored in three different ways at room temperature, refrigeration and deep freezing. .The Stored fish samples were analyzed for proximate composition such as moisture content, crude protein, crude fat and total ash using standard methods. The  results obtained indicated that different storage methods used in this study significantly (p<0.05) affected the level of proximate, composition of the fish with good and acceptable values obtained in the fish preserved under room temperature. 

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Fish is very prone to decomposition, development of rancidity and microbial spoilage, immediately after harvest, therefore, there is a great need to process and preserve harvested fish items in order to extend its shelf life for human consumption [1]. Some of the processing and preservation techniques commonly used are salting, drying, smoking, canning, freezing, pickling and irradiation among others. In Nigeria, the greater portion of fish caught are preserved by smoking and sun drying [2]. In order to arrest fish spoilage, different processing methods are applied in the tropics. Some techniques are based on temperature control by using ice, refrigeration or freezing; while others based on the control of water activity through drying, salting, smoking and freeze-drying [3]. Most often a combination of different processing techniques is used to preserve fish, as different processing methods have different effects on nutritional composition of fish.  The simplest and most widely practiced method is smoking, usually with traditional methods of fish smoking. This is widely practiced in the riverine areas, fishing towns and villages and are scattered far away from consuming centers [4].

                

In most of the communities in tropical regions of the world, majority of the fish caught are smoked by traditional method using drum type smoking kiln in open space under unhygienic conditions [5]. Smoke drying has the advantages of increasing the shelf life of fish since water that create favourable condition for mould or bacteria growth has been drastically reduced. Also smoking enhances the flavour, colour and odour/aroma of the fish. Intramuscular phospholipids have been shown to be the most rapidly oxidized lipid component in smoked fish or meat [6]. Awareness of these constraints and limitations prompted many research organizations to develop improved method of smoking.

 

One of the improved types of kiln was developed at the Nigeria Institute of Oceanography and Marine Research (NIOMR), Lagos [7]. In this kiln, the central dome acts as the heat exchanger and also maintains a uniform temperature inside smoking kiln. The smoke produced enters the heat exchanger and then enters the smoking kiln through the tubes because of this arrangement, there is uniform distribution of smoke inside the smoking kiln and temperature is controlled by adjusting the addition of fire wood and wet saw dust inside the fire place. The smoke circulates uniformly inside the smoking chamber and then escapes at the top. A smoking kiln may be linked to a large square rectangular chimney, opened at the bottom as in the case of the fire place. The mechanical kiln is more easily controlled and gives a more uniform and more hygienic product with less labour [8].

 

Any fish can be smoked, however, fatter fish will absorb more smoke flavour, so fish like, mackerel, salmon and trout are perfect for smoking. According to Tobor [9], smoked products are known to possess an increased resistance to oxidative changes in fatty foods such as fish. The phenolic substances found in smoke are believed to be responsible for such effects on foods. Ito [10] recorded that smoking and drying treatment applied to fish account for 45% of the total preservation methods available to rural fishermen. According to Ihekoronye and Ngoddy the preservation and processing of fresh water and marine fishes largely depend on the technology developed in any particular area. Due to erratic power supply and the unavailability of storage facilities for most rural households, dried fish which store for several weeks before consumption represents the most inexpensive source of animal protein for rural dwellers. As a result of high temperature involved in fish drying and the long storage weeks, most of the proteins are denatured and this leads to reduction in functionality of essential amino acids. The totality of these, often results in fish products with low nutritive value, thereby exposing the populace who rely on dried fish products for their source of animal protein nutritionally insecure. However, consumers rarely have information about the nutritional quality of smoked fish and its quality changes during storage, thus the need for this study. This study aimed to determine the nutritional quality of smoked marine fishes as well as to examine the effect of ambient storage on its proximate qualities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental Location

The experiment was conducted at the Fish Processing Unit, in African Regional Aquaculture Centre, Aluu in Port Harcourt.

 

Source of Fish Materials

The fish materials that wereused in this research work consist of fresh samples of four fish species of marine origin: They are:Red snapper (Lutjanus goreensis); Croaker (Pseudotolithus elongatus); Mullet (Mugil cephalus) and Bonga  (Ethmalosa fimbriata).These were purchased from Creek Road Market in Port Harcourt. They were identified with the keys of [11] on marine and brackish water fishes. Red snapper (Lutjanus goreensis);Croaker (Pseudotolithus elongatus); Mullet (Mugil cephalus) and Bonga  (Ethmalosa fimbriata). The fish were purchased in fresh form from Creek Road main market in Port Harcourt, Rivers State. 

 

Experimental Procedure

Each of the four species was weighed with weighing scale. In each of the species,4kg was weighed, decaled, and the viscera removed and washed in clean water.Brining was done by dipping the fish into 75% saturated brine which was made by dissolving 27g of salt (NaCl) in 100ml of water for 30 seconds [12]. The fish was again rinsed in fresh water. The fish samples were spread in trays and taken for smoking. 

        

In NIOMR Kiln, the fish was smoked for three hours at 155±50C and then maintained at 55±50C until constant weight was reached.  While in Half Drum, the fish was smoked for three hours at 95±50C and then maintained at 45±50C until constant weight was reached.

 

The smoked fish of different species were preserved in three different ways for three weeks:

 

  • Freezer (-50C)

  • Refrigerator (40C)

  • Room temperature (27- 300C).

 

The stored fish were then be analyzed for proximate values.

 

Determination of Proximate Composition of Fish

Proximate chemical composition analysis including determination of moisture content, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, carbohydrates and total ash of the smoked fish was performed according to AOAC official methods [13]. Petri dish was cleaned and weighed. Then 1.0 g of each of the grounded fish samples was measured in each petridish and then weighed. They were each transferred into the oven at 105°C for 3 hours. After the first 3 hours, the petridish was removed from the oven, allowed to cool and weighed. The petridish was returned into the oven and was brought out after an hour and weighed again; this process was repeated until a constant weight was achieved and moisture content was determined. The crude protein was determined using Kjeldahl method. The fish sample (either smoked or frozen) was ground into a fine or smooth texture. A known weight (5.0 g) of the fish sample is then weighed into a long necked Kjedahl flask along with 5 g of copper sulphate anhydrous and 5 g of sodium sulphate anhydrous. Then, 25 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4) was added. The flask was gently placed and the content was heated, the heating continued until a clear solution was obtained. The digestion was performed between 3 to 5 hours. The clear hot solution obtained was allowed to cool and solution was filtered using filter paper. Then, 5 ml of the filtered digested sample was poured into the protein determination equipment and 10 ml of 40% NaOH was added followed by a distillation process. The steam being passed in the reactor condenses and drops into a conical flask containing boric acid (5 ml) until the mixture changes color. After changing color, 50 ml of the liquid was collected and titrated with 0.01 M of HCl until the color (green) changed to deep blue. For the estimation of fat content, the dried samples left after moisture determination were finely ground and the fat was extracted for 4 hours with a non-polar solvent (i.e. ethyl ether) using soxhlet extraction method. After extraction, the solvent was evaporated and the extracted fat was weighed. Ash was determined by burning the dried sample in a furnace at 550°C for 4 h. The difference in weights before and after burning gave the total ash content. Crude Fibre was determined using trichloroacetic acid method as recommended by AOAC [13]. The total carbohydrate content was determined by subtracting the sum of the percentage moisture, ash, crude lipid, and crude protein from 100%.

 

Statistical Analysis 

The data obtained from the study was collated and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 22.0). A two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to reveal significant differences in measured variables. When a difference was detected (p<0.05), Tukey’s multiple comparison test was applied to identify differences between the means [14].

RESULTS

The proximate compositions of marine fishes smoked with Half Drum Kiln and preserved under room temperature are presented in Table 1. The results indicated the highest value of moisture content (6.53±0.03%) was observed in P. elongatus, this was closely followed by that ofM.cephalus (6.52±0.02%), while the lowest (5.16±0.02 %) was recorded in E. fimbriata. The lowest crude protein value (58.67±0.03%) was recorded in E. fimbriata, while other species were within the same range with no significant difference (p>0.05). Higher values of crude fat were recorded in L.goreensis and E. fimbriata when compared to other species. The highest values of ash (16.47±0.01%) was observed inP. elongatus and the lowest (9.21±0.02%) inM.cephalus. However, zero values were recorded in crude fiber and carbohydrates in all species under consideration. The proximate compositions of marine fishes smoked with Half Drum Kiln and preserved with freezer are shown in Table 2. The results obtained revealed that the highest value of moisture content (8.53±0.01%) was observed in L.goreensis, this was closely followed by that of E. fimbriata (8.41±0.03%), while the lowest (5.10±0.02 %) was recorded in M.cephalus. The lowest crude protein value (46.00±0.05%) was recorded in E. fimbriata, while other species were within the same range with no significant different (p>0.05).  Higher values of crude fat were recorded in L.goreensis and P. elongatus when compared to other species. The highest values of ash (14.90±0.02%) were observed in E. fimbriata and the lowest (12.54±0.01%) inP. elongatus. However, zero values were recorded in crude fibre and carbohydrates in all species under consideration. In the fishes smoked with half drum kiln and preserved with a refrigerator (Table 3), the moisture content of E. fimbriata and M. cephalus were within the same range. While that of L.goreensis and P.elongatuswere within the same range. The highest value of crude protein (78.67±0.05%) was recorded in E. fimbriata, while other species were within the same range with no significant difference (p>0.05).  Higher values of crude fat content were recorded in L.goreensis and M.cephalus when compared to other species. The highest values of ash (15.52±0.02%) was observed in M.cephalus and the lowest (6.84±0.02%) inE. fimbriata . However, zero values were recorded in crude fibre and carbohydrates for all species. 

 

Furthermore, the proximate compositions of marine fishes smoked with NIOMR Kiln and preserved under room temperature are presented in Table 4.The results revealed that the highest value of moisture content (7.44±0.04%) was recorded in M.cephalus , while other species were within the same range with no significant difference (p>0.05). The values of crude protein and crude fat  varied significantly among the species  under consideration. The highest values of ash (18.59±0.01%) was observed in P. elongatus and the lowest (7.16±0.03%) inM.cephalus . However, zero values were recorded in crude fiber and carbohydrates in all species under consideration.

 

The proximate compositions of marine fishes smoked with NIOMR Kiln and preserved with freezer are shown in Table 5.The results obtained revealed that the highest value of moisture content (10.35±0.03%) was observed in E. fimbriata, while other species were within the same range with no significant difference (p>0.05). The lowest crude protein value (57.29±0.08%) was recorded in L.goreensiswhile higher values were recorded in other species and these  were within the same range with no significant difference (p>0.05).  The specie L.goreensis had the highest value (29.73±0.08%) of  crude fat, whereas lower  values were recorded in other species and these  were within the same range with no significant difference (p>0.05). The lowest values of ash (4.29±0.02%) was observed in E. fimbriata, the ash value in other species were within the same range. However, zero values were recorded in crude fibre and carbohydrates in all species under consideration. In the fishes smoked with NIOMR kiln and preserved with a refrigerator (Table 6), the highest value (8.75±0.06%) of moisture content was recorded in M.cephalus and the lowest (4.36±0.02%) was recorded in L.goreensis.The highest value of crude protein (79.88±0.02%) was recorded in E. fimbriata, and the lowest (56.54±0.04%) was inL.goreensis.  The values of crude fat varied significantly among the species, with the highest value (31.70±0.06%) in L. goreensis and the lowest (7.25±0.02%) obtained in E. fimbriata. The highest values of ash (15.94±0.04%) was    observed in P. elongatus  and the lowest (7.39±0.71%) inL.goreensis. However, zero values were recorded in crude fibre and carbohydrates in all species under consideration.

 

Table 1: Proximate Composition of Marine Fish Species Smoked with Half Drum and Preserved under Room Temperature (Mean±SD)

Proximate Composition (%)

Experimental Species

E.fimbriata

P.elongatus

M.cephalus

L.goreensis

Moisture Content 

5.16±0.02a                              

6.53±0.03b

6.52±0.02b

5.17 ±0.02a

 Crude Protein

58.67±0.03a

61.82±0.03b

69.15±0.03b

60.68±0.031b

Crude Fat

22.63±0.04b

15.17±0.02a

15.11±0.02a

23.30±0.04b

Crude Fibre

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Ash

13.54±0.04b                    

16.47±0.01c

9.21±0.02a

10.85±0.02b

CHO

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Mean with different superscript within the same row are significantly different (p< 0.05)1

 

Table 2: Proximate Composition of Marine Fish Species Smoked with Half Drum and Preserved with Freezer (Mean±SD)

Proximate Composition (%)

Experimental Species

E.fimbriata

P.elongatus

M.cephalus

L.goreensis

Moisture Content 

8.41±0.03c

7.00±0.03b

5.10±0.02a

8.53±0.01c

 Crude Protein

46.00±0.05a

65.32±0.02b

67.30±0.05b

63.02±0.03b

Crude Fat

14.42±0.02a                     

15.14±0.02b

13.21±0.01a

15.88±0.03b

Crude Fibre

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Ash

14.90±0.02b                    

12.54±0.01a

14.39±0.03b

12.57±0.03a

CHO

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Mean with different superscript within the same row are significantly different (p<0.05)

 

Table 3: Proximate Composition of Some Smoked (Half Drum) Marine Fish Species Preserved with Fridge (Mean±SD)

Proximate Composition (%)

Experimental Species

E.fimbriata

P.elongatus

M.cephalus

L.goreensis 

Moisture Content 

4.37±0.03a

7.37±0.023b

4.99±0.04a

7.44±0.026b

Crude Protein

78.67±0.05b

68.77±0.08a

65.52±0.05a

63.43±0.021a

Crude Fat

10.12±0.02b

9.68±0.04a

14.10±0.02c

15.57±0.01c

Crude Fibre

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Ash

6.84±0.02a

14.17±0.02b

15.52±0.02b

13.57±0.02b

CHO

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Mean with different superscript within the same row are significantly different (p<0.05)

 

Table 4: Proximate Composition of Marine Fish Species Smoked with NIOMR Kiln and Preserved under Room Temperature (Mean±SD)

Proximate Composition (%)

Experimental Species

E.fimbriata

P.elongatus

M.cephalus

L.goreensis 

Moisture Content 

5.11±0.02a

5.12±0.026a

7.44±0.04b

5.37±0.22a

Crude Protein

69.33±0.04b

57.79±0.06a

78.26±0.04c

60.91±0.023b

Crude Fat

9.26±0.02a

18.49±0.02b

7.13±0.04a

25.79±0.02c

Crude Fibre

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Ash

16.30±0.03b

18.59±0.01a

7.16±0.03b

7.55±0.03b

CHO

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Mean with different superscript within the same row are significantly different (p<0.05)

 

Table 5: Proximate Composition of Marin Fish Species Smoked with NIOMR Kiln and Preserved with Freezer (Mean±SD)

Proximate Composition (%)

Experimental Species

E.fimbriata

P.elongatus

M.cephalus

L.goreensis 

Moisture Content 

10.35±0.03b

5.22±0.021a

5.31±0.02a

4.12±0.02a

Crude Protein

78.17±0.03b

79.23±0.025b

77.81±0.02b

57.29±0.08a

Crude Fat

7.19±0.02a                        

7.12±0.02a

8.76±0.03a

29.73±0.08b

Crude Fibre

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Ash

4.29±0.02a

8.42±0.02a

8.11±0.02a

8.86±0.02a

CHO

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Mean with different superscript within the same row are significantly different (p<0.05)

 

Table 6: Proximate Composition of Marine Fish Species Smoked with NIOMR Kiln and Preserved with Fridge (Mean±SD)

Proximate Composition (%)

Experimental Species

E.fimbriata

P.elongatus

M.cephalus

L.goreensis 

Moisture Content 

4.76±0.025a

6.73±0.05b

8.75±0.06c

4.36±0.2a

 Crude Protein

79.88±0.025b

58.53±0.04a

72.93±0.05b

56.54±0.04a

Crude Fat

7.25±0.02a

18.80±0.06b

8.63±0.02a

31.70±0.062c

Crude Fibre

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Ash

8.11±0.02a

15.94±0.04b

9.69±0.03a

7.39±0.71a

CHO

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

0.00±0.00a

Mean with different superscript within the same row are significantly different (p<0.05)

DISCUSSION

The moisture content can be described as an indicator to the frequency at which deterioration occurred in fish samples resulting in the early decomposition. During storage at refrigeration, freezing and room temperature, percentage of moisture content was found to vary from one specie to another in the two smoking kilns. There was a slight increase in the moisture content of the smoked fish stored at room temperature and those preserved in refrigerator and freezer.  The increase can be attributed to absorption of moisture from the surrounding since there was no re-drying during storage period [15].  Conversely, Clucas and Ward, reported that moisture content of 12% is the level beyond which fish products begin to develop moulds after few days. In this study the final moisture of the preserved smoke-dried fish samples was less than 12% in all the species.

 

During storage, the value of crude protein in smoked fish samples preserved under room temperature and refrigerator were within the same range. However, lower values of crude protein were observed in the fish stored in freezer. An indication that frozen storage reduced the percentage protein content of the samples. This result agrees with the findings of Wu and Mao [16] in smoked grass carp stored in the freezer.  Also, Xing-hua et al. [17] reported the same trend in smoked Sinilabeo rendalii during frozen storage. They attributed this protein loss to the leaching effect of amino acids and water soluble protein leaching out with melting ice. Moreover, Zaglol and Eltadawy [18] noted that protein decreased with increasing duration of frozen storage. Disadvantages such as product dehydration, rancidity, drip loss and product bleaching have an overall effect on the quality of frozen food. According to Window et al.  [19] proteins exposed to oxidizing environments are very susceptible to chemical modification, such as amino acid destruction, peptide scission and formation of protein-lipid complexes that results in decrease in protein content.  On the other hand, Eyo [12] attributed this loss to gradual degradation of the initial crude protein to more volatile products such as Total Volatile Bases (TVB), Hydrogen sulphide and Ammonia. 

 

The crude fat values obtained in the smoked marine fishes stored under different conditions such as refrigeration and freezing showed a slight decrease in lipid content during storage when compared with those that were stored at room temperature. This result was supported by Fagbenro et al. [20] in smoked fresh water fish stored in the freezer, and that of Gomez-guillen et al. [21] who found a significant loss in total lipid content during frozen storage of smoked Atlantic salmon. These workers attributed this loss to oxidation of lipid. As Hasan [22] noted that reduction in lipid content could be attributed to oxidation of poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) contained in the fish tissue to products such as peroxides, aldehydes, ketones and free fatty acids. Ikeme [23] also reported that reduction in lipid is associated with higher PV and FFA in five different species of smoked freshwater fish stored in ambient temperatures for eight weeks.

 

In this study, slight decrease was observed in ash contents of the smoked marine fishes preserved in freezer and refrigerator, when compared to the one stored at room temperature. The decrease in ash content during storage as observed in this work is in agreement with the observation of Robinson et al., [24] in channel catfish, who reported a decrease in total ash content during frozen storage. However, Rossano et al. [25] observed that the ash content remained almost the same throughout the 20 days of frozen storage of mora fish (Mora moro). The decrease in ash content was attributed to the drip loss [26]. There are slight changes in the mineral profiles of fish stored in freezer and refrigerator, when compared to the one stored at room temperature. This result is in accordance with Sadiku and Oladimeji [27] who observed some changes in mineral contents of smokedLates niloticus stored at different temperatures. The changes with respect to frozen and refrigeration period in all the minerals evaluated could be attributed to drip loss and dehydration that is associated with cold and frozen storage [28]. 

CONCLUSION

This study has also shown that using any of the storage conditions such as room temperature, refrigeration and freezing, there were significant differences in the quality of smoked marine fishes. There were changes in the proximate, mineral and microbial quality during the storage period. However smoked marine fishes stored under room temperature had a less reduction in quality.

REFERENCE
  1. Agiopu, B.F. The quality of liquid smoked cured intermediate moisture beef under ambient storage. M.Sc. Project Report, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, pp. 12–126.

  2. Tawari, C.C. Effectiveness of agricultural agencies in fisheries management and production in the Niger Delta. Ph.D. Thesis, Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

  3. Eyo, A.A. Fish processing technology in the tropics. University of Ilorin Press, pp. 403.

  4. Hoffman, A. et al. "The effect of processing and storage upon the nutritive value of smoked fish from Africa." Tropical Science, vol. 19, no. 1, 2017, pp. 41–43.

  5. Bhandary, C.S. et al. "Studies on traditional and improved methods of smoking fish." FAO Expert Consultation on Fish Technology in Africa, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2014, pp. 140–146.

  6. Osuji, F.N.C. "The influence of traditional handling methods on the quality of processed fish in Nigeria." Proceedings of conference on handling, processing and marketing of tropical fish, London, 2007, pp. 312–322.

  7. Adeyemi, R.S. and G.R. Akande. "Thermo-physical properties of farmed African freshwater catfish (Clarias gariepinus) fillet for process design and optimization." Nigerian Food Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, 2011, pp. 67–77.

  8. Ali, M.E. et al. Body characteristics, yield indices and proximate chemical composition of commercial fish species of Lake Nubia. Graduation Project Thesis, Juba University, pp. 213.

  9. Tobor, J.G. A review of the fish industry in Nigeria and status of fish preservation method and future growth perquisite to cope with anticipated increase in production. NIOMR Technical Paper, Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, Nigeria, 2004.

  10. Ito, S. "The distribution effect of compliance with food safety and agricultural health standards on small producers in developing countries." Proceedings for the Japan Society for International Development, vol. 23, 2005, pp. 113–116.

  11. Ames, G. et al. Post-harvest losses of fish in the tropics. Natural Resources Institute Overseas Development Administration, 1999, pp. 11.

  12. Eyo, A.A. Fish processing technology in the tropics. National Institute for Freshwater Fisheries Research, University of Ilorin Press, 2001, pp. 10–70.

  13. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C., 2000.

  14. Wahua, T.A.T. Applied statistics for scientific studies. Afnk-link Books, Ibadan, 1999, pp. 41–86.

  15. Ashraf, M.A. et al. "Nutritional value of wild and cultivated silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)." International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, vol. 13, 2011, pp. 210–214.

  16. Wu, T. and L. Mao. "Influences of hot air drying and microwave drying on nutritional and odorous properties of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) fillets." Food Chemistry Journal, vol. 110, 2008, pp. 647–653.

  17. Xing-hua, Z.H.O.U. et al. "Evaluation of nutritional components and nutritive quality in muscle of Sinilabeo rendahli." Freshwater Fisheries, vol. 11, 2007, pp. 45–53.

  18. Zaglol, N.F. and F. Eltadawy. "Study on chemical quality and nutrition value of freshwater crayfish (Procambarus clarkia)." Journal of the Arabian Aquaculture Society, vol. 4, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1–18.

  19. Window, H.D. et al. "Comparison of trace metal concentrations in muscle of a bentho-pelagic fish (Coryphaenoides armatus) from the Atlantic and Pacific oceans." Deep Sea Research, vol. 34, no. 2, 1987, pp. 21–25.

  20. Fagbenro, O.O. et al. "Proximate and mineral composition in some selected freshwater fishes in Nigeria." Internet Journal of Food Safety, vol. 9, 2007, pp. 52–55.

  21. Gomez-Guillen, M.C. et al. "Biological characteristics affect the quality of farmed Atlantic salmon and smoked muscle." Journal of Food Science, vol. 65, no. 1, 2000, pp. 53–60.

  22. Hasan, M.M. Improvement of food quality of traditional dried small indigenous fish products using rotary dryer and solar tunnel dryer. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Fisheries Technology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh, 2006.

  23. Ikeme, A.I. Characteristics of traditionally smoked dried fish. FAO Expert Consultation on Fish Technology in Africa, Accra, Ghana, 2007.

  24. Robinson, E.H. et al. "Nutrient characteristics of pond-raised channel catfish." Research Report, vol. 22, no. 14, 2001, pp. 1–5.

  25. Rossano, R. et al. "Proteins, fatty acids and nutritional value in the muscle of the fish species Mora mora." Molecular Nutrient Food Resources, vol. 49, no. 10, 2005, pp. 926–931.

  26. Razzaque, M.A. et al. "Culture possibility of Scheilbeid catfish using formulated feed in natural pond." Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 6, no. 2, 2008, pp. 375–380.

  27. Sadiku, S.O.E. and A.A. Oladimeji. "Relationship of proximate composition of Lates niloticus." Synodontis Schall Research Commission, vol. 3, no. 1, 1991, pp. 29–40.

  28. Shaman, E.F. and Z.A. Ansari. "Biochemical composition and caloric content in sand whiting Sillago sihama (Forsskal), from Zuary Estuary, Goa." Indian Journal of Fisheries, vol. 57, no. 1, 2010, pp. 61–64.

None
None
None
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Efficacy of Different Maturity Stages of Indian almond Tree Leaves as Anaesthetics in African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fingerlings
...
Published: 30/11/2021
Download PDF
Research Article
Haematological Responses in Sarotherodon melanotheron Exposed to Linear Akylbenzene Sulfonate in the Laboratory
...
Published: 30/11/2021
Download PDF
Research Article
Appraisal of Challenges and Solutions for a Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture Sector in a Continuously Changing Climate
Published: 31/01/2022
Download PDF
Research Article
Impact of Adoption of Organic Fertilizer on Poverty Reduction Among Farming Households in North-Central, Nigeria
Published: 27/04/2021
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Flowbite Logo
PO Box 101, Nakuru
Kenya.
Email: office@iarconsortium.org

Editorial Office:
J.L Bhavan, Near Radison Blu Hotel,
Jalukbari, Guwahati-India
Useful Links
Order Hard Copy
Privacy policy
Terms and Conditions
Refund Policy
Shipping Policy
Others
About Us
Team Members
Contact Us
Online Payments
Join as Editor
Join as Reviewer
Subscribe to our Newsletter
+91 60029-93949
Follow us
MOST SEARCHED KEYWORDS
Copyright © iARCON International LLP . All Rights Reserved.