Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
385 Views
418 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 2 Issue 2 (July-Dec, 2022) | Pages 1 - 3
Review of Local Budget in District and City Development of North Sumatera
 ,
 ,
1
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
May 1, 2022
Revised
June 4, 2022
Accepted
July 29, 2022
Published
Aug. 26, 2022
Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Regency/City local budget in North Sumatra in terms of the ratio of regional financial independence. The data used in this study is secondary data in the form of Budget Realization Reports (LRA) for 33 district/city governments in North Sumatra province for 2018-2020, obtained from the official website of the Directorate General of State Fiscal Balance (DJPK). The data analysis technique used descriptive financial ratio analysis. The results of this study reveal that it can be seen that the level of regional independence in the province of North Sumatra is very low when viewed from the average of 33 regencies/cities, which is 8.88%. If it is related to the relationship pattern and the level of regional independence, the level of independence of the regency/city regional government in North Sumatra province is classified in the very low independence category with an instructive relationship pattern. Regency/city regional government in North Sumatra province.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Regional development is an integral part of national development. Because regional development is one of the indicators or supports for the realization of national development. Therefore, the central government makes a policy on Regional Government in which local governments are given broad authority to regulate their own households. This is in accordance with Law Number 12 of 2008 concerning regional government, as a revision of Law Number 32 of 2004. According to Law Number 12 of 2008 that government is carried out based on the principle of decentralization, the principle of deconcentration and the principle of co-administration, in the context of decentralization formed and compiled by the provincial government and the city government as an autonomous region [1,2].

 

The Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (local budget) is the regional government's annual financial plan which is discussed and approved jointly by the regional government and DPRD and stipulated by regional regulations. Local budget is an annual work plan to realize local government activities, both routine and development, which are regulated and calculated with money. The process of preparing the budget, whether it is local budget is often an important issue that is in the public's attention, even the local budget is a political tool used by the government itself and the opposition [3].

 

Based on the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation number 27 of 2013 concerning guidelines for the preparation of the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (local budget), it can be defined that the local budget is an annual regional government financial plan that is discussed and approved jointly by the regional government and DPRD, and is determined by regional regulations. Where on the one hand describes the estimated maximum expenditure to finance regional activities and projects within a certain budget year, and on the other hand describes the estimated revenue from regional revenue sources to cover the expenditures in question [4,5].

 

The regional government as the party entrusted with the task of running the wheels of government, development and community services is required to submit a regional financial accountability report to be assessed whether the regional government has succeeded in carrying out its duties properly or not. The ability of local governments to manage finances is contained in the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (LOCAL BUDGET) which reflects the ability of local governments to finance activities for implementing government tasks, development and community social services. Evaluation of regional financial management and regional financial financing will greatly determine the position of a regional government in the context of implementing regional autonomy [6-8].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The approach in this research is a quantitative/associative approach. According to Russiadi, et al. “a qualitative/associative research approach is a study that aims to determine the degree of relationship and the pattern/form of influence between two or more variables. The type of data used in this research is secondary data. The data needed is the data in the Budget Realization Report (LRA) of the Regency/City Government in North Sumatra Province for 2018-2020.The method used to collect data in this research is documentation. Documentation is the collection of data and documents and records related to the problem under study. The data in this study comes from data from the Regional Government Budget Realization Report in the province of North Sumatra in 2018-2020. The data is obtained through recording or softcopy of the required data obtained from the official website/website of BPS and the Directorate General of State Fiscal Balance [9].

 

The population in this study were all district/city governments in North Sumatra Province, as many as 33 local governments consisting of 25 districts and 8 cities. The technique of taking research samples using saturated sampling technique [10]. According to Sugiyono saturated sampling is a sampling technique when all members of the population are used as samples. This is often done when the population is relatively small. Another term for saturated sample is census, where all members of the population are sampled. Based on this, there were 33 samples of districts/cities in North Sumatra Province during 2018-2020 (Appendix 2) with 99 units of observation analysis (33 x 3) [11].

 

This study uses descriptive analysis techniques, meaning that research is carried out by explaining and describing and analyzing the data obtained regarding the problems studied. According to Situmorang and Lufti descriptive analysis is the most basic analysis to describe the general state of the data. This description analysis includes several sub menus, one of which is ratio analysis. The data is identified and financial ratio analysis is calculated based on the indicators/formulas that have been determined as a reference in the study. The financial ratio used in this study is the regional financial independence ratio.

RESULTS

The results of the study present the results of the ratio analysis of the financial independence of the districts/cities in the province of North Sumatra for the 2018-2020 period (Table 1).

 

Table 1: Analysis of Regional Financial Independence Ratio

NoInformation201820192020AverageClassificationRating
1Asahan District6.55%7.51%3.49%5.85%Very low19
2Dairi . County7.51%7.08%6.84%7.14%Very low15
3Deli Serdang Regency21.52%22.73%22.57%22.27%Very low2
4Tanah Karo Kabupaten Regency7.77%6.34%7.37%7.16%Very low14
5Labuhan Batu Regency14.64%11.08%10.94%12.22%Very low5
6Langkat Regency6.85%6.46%6.37%6.56%Very low17
7Mandailing Natal Kabupaten3.81%5.54%5.20%4.85%Very low23
8Nias Regency14.44%11.43%11.26%12.38%Very low4
9Simalungun Regency6.23%6.15%6.35%6.24%Very low18
10South Tapanuli Regency12.02%11.17%6.77%9.99%Very low10
11Central Tapanuli Regency7.03%7.11%7.19%7.11%Very low16
12North Tapanuli Regency7.87%8.00%8.59%8.15%Very low12
13Toba Samosir Kabupaten Regency3.54%3.73%5.88%4.38%Very low26
14Binjai City9.83%10.23%11.22%10.43%Very low9
15Medan city52.08%53.79%55.37%53.75%Currently1
16Pematang Siantar City12.21%12.01%10.35%11.52%Very low7
17Sibolga City11.30%11.01%12.35%11.55%Very low6
18Tanjung Balai City11.21%11.06%10.88%11.05%Very low8
19Cliff City13.45%14.10%15.32%14.29%Very low3
20Padang Sidempuan City8.51%9.61%10.61%9.58%Very low11
21Pakpak Bharat Regency3.43%3.47%3.79%3.57%Very low29
22South Nias Regency2.04%1.88%1.64%1.85%Very low33
23Humbang Hasundutan Regency4.26%4.77%4.95%4.66%Very low25
24Serdang Bedagai Regency7.38%6.74%8.15%7.43%Very low13
25Samosir . Regency6.39%5.32%5.31%5.67%Very low21
26Coal District5.43%5.94%5.75%5.70%Very low20
27Padang Lawas Regency5.12%5.08%4.11%4.77%Very low24
28North Padang Lawas Regency3.81%3.74%2.99%3.51%Very low30
29South Labuhanbatu Regency5.64%4.63%5.06%5.11%Very low22
30North Labuhanbatu Regency4.36%4.21%4.51%4.36%Very low27
31North Nias Regency1.44%2.90%3.64%2.66%Very low32
32West Nias Regency2.84%3.21%3.19%3.08%Very low31
33Gunung Sitoli3.90%4.07%4.31%4.09%Very low28

 

Table 1 shows the results of the calculation of the financial independence ratio of districts/cities in North Sumatra province for the 2018-2020 period which is volatile. There were 16 local governments that showed an increase in regional independence in 2019 and 17 local governments experienced a decrease, while in 2020 there were 16 local governments experiencing a decrease in independence and 17 local governments experiencing an increase in independence. Based on the average, the regency/municipal government that occupies the first level of independence is the city of Medan with an average score of 53.75%, while the district/city government that occupies the last level of independence is South Nias district with an average score of 53.75%. 1.85%.

 

Based on the results of the ratio analysis in Table 1, it can be seen that the level of regional independence in the province of North Sumatra is very low when viewed from the average of 33 regencies/cities, which is 8.88%. If it is related to the relationship pattern and the level of regional independence (Table 1), the level of independence of the district/city government in the province of North Sumatra is classified in the category of very low independence with an instructive relationship pattern. An instructive relationship where the role of the central government is more dominant than the independence of local governments. However, if viewed by regional government, the city of Medan is the regional government that has the highest independence (an average of 53.75%) out of 33 districts/cities in North Sumatra province with moderate independence with a participatory relationship pattern.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the discussion in Section 4.2 through ratio analysis and different tests in assessing the financial performance of district/city governments in North Sumatra province for the period 2014-2016 it can be concluded that the financial performance of district/city governments in North Sumatra province in terms of the ratio of regional financial independence shows that The level of independence of district/city governments in North Sumatra province is on average very low with an instructive relationship pattern. 


However, if viewed by local government, the city of Medan has the highest level of independence out of 33 districts/cities in North Sumatra province, with independence categorized as moderate with a participatory relationship pattern, while the local government with the lowest level of independence is South Nias district.

 

REFERENCES
  1. Asri, Dwi Jatnika. “Comparison of district/city government financial performance in West Java Province in 2009–2013.” Journal of Accounting & Financial Research, vol. 4, no. 2, 2016, pp. 1021–1034. ISSN 2338-1507.

  2. Badrudin, Rudy. Economics of Regional Autonomy. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN, 2012.

  3. Batafor, Gregorius Gehi. Evaluation of Financial Performance and Level of Community Welfare of Lembata Regency – NTT Province. Thesis, Udayana University, 2011.

  4. Dharmawati, Mentari Kurnia, and Ririn Irmadariyani. “Financial ratio analysis of the regional revenue and expenditure budget (Local Budget) in assessing the financial performance of the Banyuwangi regency government.” Student Scientific Article, 2016, pp. 1–5.

  5. Dwijayanti, Retno, and Rusherlistyanti. “Comparative analysis of the financial performance of provincial governments in Indonesia.” Journal of Economics and Business, vol. 12, no. 1, 2013, pp. 43–66. ISSN 1693-0908.

  6. Erlina, Omar Sakti Rambe, and Rasdianto. Regional Financial Accounting: Accrual Based. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2015.

  7. Halim, Abdul. Public Sector Accounting: Regional Financial Accounting. 3rd ed., Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2007.

  8. Harahap, Sofyan Syafri. Critical Analysis of Financial Statements. 7th ed., Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2008.

  9. Indriantoro, and Supomo. Business Research Methodology. 1st ed., Yogyakarta: BPFE Publisher, 2002.

  10. Korompot, Riska, and Jessy Warongan. “Analysis of financial performance in the government of north Sulawesi.” Journal of Accountability, vol. 6, no. 2, 2017, pp. 9–19.

  11. Magdalena, Marissa, and Heni Kurniawan Ch. “Comparison of provincial government financial performance indicators in Indonesia.” MODUS, vol. 25, no. 2, 2013, pp. 91–106. ISSN 0852-1875.

Recommended Articles
Research Article
Administrative Control Mechanisms over Acts of Public Administration in Iraqi Law
Published: 25/01/2026
Download PDF
Research Article
The Effectiveness of Using AI-Generated Visual Forms (ChatGPT) on Biology Achievement and Learning Motivation among Second-Grade Intermediate Students
Published: 25/02/2026
Download PDF
Research Article
The Image of the Religious Hero in the Poetry of the 8th and 9th Centuries AH: The Social Structure as A Model
Published: 21/11/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
George Washington as a Visionary Leader
Published: 22/04/2022
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Flowbite Logo
PO Box 101, Nakuru
Kenya.
Email: office@iarconsortium.org

Editorial Office:
J.L Bhavan, Near Radison Blu Hotel,
Jalukbari, Guwahati-India
Useful Links
Order Hard Copy
Privacy policy
Terms and Conditions
Refund Policy
Shipping Policy
Others
About Us
Team Members
Contact Us
Online Payments
Join as Editor
Join as Reviewer
Subscribe to our Newsletter
+91 60029-93949
Follow us
MOST SEARCHED KEYWORDS
Copyright © iARCON International LLP . All Rights Reserved.