Immunotherapy and reverse vaccinology are two groundbreaking approaches in modern medicine that have transformed the landscape of disease prevention and treatment. Immunotherapy harnesses the body's immune system to combat diseases, particularly cancer, by either enhancing or suppressing immune responses. Reverse vaccinology, on the other hand, utilizes genomic data to design vaccines, offering a revolutionary method for vaccine development. This review provides an in-depth exploration of these innovative strategies, elucidating their mechanisms, applications, and the substantial advancements they have contributed to healthcare.1-4
Definition and Classification5-7
Immunotherapy, also known as biological therapy, refers to the treatment of disease by inducing, enhancing, or suppressing an immune response. This broad definition encompasses various techniques and strategies aimed at modulating the immune system to fight diseases more effectively. Immunotherapies can be broadly classified into two categories:
Activation Immunotherapies: These are designed to elicit or amplify an immune response. Activation immunotherapies are particularly beneficial in conditions where boosting the immune system can help in attacking disease cells, such as in cancer.
Suppression Immunotherapies: These aim to reduce or suppress an immune response. Suppression immunotherapies are useful in conditions where the immune system is overactive, such as autoimmune diseases, where it attacks the body's own tissues.
Categories of Immunotherapy7-10
Immunotherapy can be further categorized based on its mechanism of action and the nature of the immune response it stimulates or suppresses:
Active Immunotherapy: This approach directs the immune system to target and attack tumor cells by focusing on tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). It stimulates the body's own immune cells to recognize and eliminate cancer cells, creating a targeted immune response.
Passive Immunotherapy: Passive immunotherapy enhances existing anti-tumor responses by providing the immune system with additional components, such as monoclonal antibodies, lymphocytes, and cytokines. These therapies do not rely on the body's own immune cells to initiate a response but instead supply the necessary elements to bolster the immune attack on cancer cells.
Hybrid (Active and Passive) Immunotherapy: This approach combines elements of both active and passive immunotherapies, aiming to optimize the immune response against cancer by using both targeted stimulation and supplemental immune components.
Mechanisms of Cancer Immunotherapy11-14
Cancer immunotherapy employs several mechanisms to combat cancer:
Stopping or Slowing Cancer Cell Growth: By targeting specific pathways or proteins that are essential for cancer cell proliferation, immunotherapies can inhibit the growth of cancer cells, effectively slowing the progression of the disease.
Preventing Cancer Spread: Immunotherapies can block mechanisms that allow cancer cells to metastasize, thereby preventing the spread of cancer to other parts of the body.
Enhancing Immune System Efficiency: By boosting the immune system's ability to recognize and destroy cancer cells, immunotherapies enhance the overall effectiveness of the immune response against cancer.
Types of Immunotherapy15-19
Monoclonal Antibodies and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors:
Monoclonal Antibodies: These are antibodies made by identical immune cells that are clones of a unique parent cell. They are designed to bind to specific targets on cancer cells, marking them for destruction by the immune system. Examples include Trastuzumab (Herceptin), which targets the HER2/neu protein in breast and stomach cancer.
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: These inhibitors work by blocking proteins on cancer cells or immune cells, allowing the immune system to attack cancer more effectively. By preventing the inhibitory signals that cancer cells use to evade immune detection, checkpoint inhibitors can enhance the immune response against tumors. Examples include Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and Nivolumab (Opdivo).
Non-Specific Immunotherapies:
Cytokines: These are proteins that send signals between cells to activate the immune system. Two main types of cytokines used in cancer treatment are interferons and interleukins. Interferons help slow the growth of cancer cells and activate immune cells, while interleukins stimulate the growth and activity of immune cells.
Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG): Used primarily for bladder cancer, BCG is a live attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis. It is instilled directly into the bladder, where it stimulates a local immune response that targets and destroys tumor cells. BCG can also be used for treating other cancers, such as malignant melanomas and certain leukemias.
Oncolytic Virus Therapy: This innovative approach uses genetically modified viruses to selectively infect and kill cancer cells. The virus replicates within the cancer cells, causing them to burst and die. This process not only destroys the infected cells but also releases tumor antigens that trigger a broader immune response against the cancer. An example is Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a modified herpes simplex virus used to treat melanoma.
T-Cell Therapy: T-cell therapy involves collecting T-cells from a patient's blood and genetically modifying them to recognize and attack cancer cells. These engineered T-cells, known as CAR T-cells (chimeric antigen receptor T-cells), are then reintroduced into the patient. CAR T-cell therapy has shown remarkable success in treating certain types of blood cancers, such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and large B-cell lymphoma.
Cancer Vaccines: Cancer vaccines aim to expose the immune system to antigens associated with cancer cells, prompting an immune response that targets and destroys those cells. There are two types of cancer vaccines:
Preventive Vaccines: Designed to prevent cancer by targeting viruses that can cause cancer. Examples include the HPV vaccine (Gardasil) and the HBV vaccine.
Therapeutic Vaccines: Designed to treat existing cancer by stimulating the immune system to attack cancer cells. An example is the dendritic cell vaccine Provenge, used to treat advanced prostate cancer.
Introduction
Reverse vaccinology represents a paradigm shift in vaccine development, moving away from traditional methods that rely on culturing pathogens. Instead, reverse vaccinology begins with the analysis of genomic data. This innovative approach was first described by Rino Rappuoli in 2000 and has since become a powerful tool for identifying vaccine candidates.
Process and Advantages
Reverse vaccinology involves a multi-step process:
Genomic Analysis: The genome of the pathogen is sequenced and analyzed in silico to identify potential vaccine candidates. This process involves using bioinformatics tools to predict which proteins are likely to be surface-exposed or secreted and therefore accessible to the immune system.
Protein Expression and Screening: The identified proteins are cloned and expressed in a suitable system, such as bacteria or yeast. These proteins are then screened for their ability to elicit an immune response in animal models, typically mice.
Validation and Testing: Promising candidates that elicit a strong immune response are further tested in preclinical studies, followed by clinical trials in humans to ensure their safety and efficacy.
Advantages of reverse vaccinology include:
Comprehensive Antigen Identification: This approach allows for the identification of all potential protein antigens, including those that are difficult to isolate using conventional methods.
Rapid and Cost-Effective: The computational nature of reverse vaccinology makes it faster and less expensive than traditional methods that rely on laboratory-based culturing and testing.
Broad Applicability: Reverse vaccinology can be applied to any pathogen with a sequenced genome, making it a versatile tool for developing vaccines against a wide range of infectious diseases.
Reverse vaccinology has been successfully applied to several pathogens, showcasing its potential to revolutionize vaccine development:
Neisseria meningitidis: For serogroup B (MenB), which lacks a broadly protective vaccine due to the similarity of its capsular polysaccharide to human antigens, reverse vaccinology identified several key proteins, including Factor H-binding protein (fHbp), Neisserial adhesin A (NadA), and Neisserial heparin-binding antigen (NHBA), which are now integral to MenB vaccines.
Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae): Using pan-genome analysis, researchers identified pilus proteins (BP-1, BP-2a, AP-1, AP-2a, GBS67) as potential vaccine targets. These proteins play a critical role in the bacterium's ability to adhere to and invade host tissues.
Group A Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes): Pan-genome reverse vaccinology and comparative genomics identified Lancefield antigens and pilus encoding genes (LPXTG motif) as promising vaccine candidates. These antigens are essential for the bacterium's virulence and pathogenicity.
Streptococcus pneumoniae: Comparative genomics revealed several pili proteins (RrgB, RrgA, RrgC) encoded by the rlrA pathogenicity islet and PitB pilus islet 2 as vaccine targets. These proteins are involved in bacterial adherence and invasion.
Escherichia coli: Comparative and subtractive reverse vaccinology identified pathogenicity islands and pathogen-specific outer membrane proteins (e.g., ECOK1_0290) as vaccine candidates. These components are crucial for the bacterium's ability to cause disease.
Staphylococcus aureus: Genome analysis of eight strains identified conserved virulence-associated surface proteins (e.g., IsdA, IsdB, SdrD, SdrE) as potential vaccine targets. These proteins are essential for the bacterium's survival and pathogenicity.
Clostridium difficile: Comparative genomics of epidemic and non-epidemic strains identified genetic regions specific to epidemic strains, such as flagella biosynthesis and glycosylation proteins, as well as 29 C. difficile spore-specific proteins. These findings have significant implications for developing vaccines against this challenging pathogen.
Chlamydia trachomatis: Genome analysis and comparative genomics of five chlamydial species identified outer membrane complex and elementary body proteins as vaccine candidates. These proteins are crucial for the bacterium's infectivity and immune evasion.
Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Reverse Vaccinology25-28
Aspect | Conventional | Reverse Vaccinology |
Type of Vaccine Components | Proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids. | Limited to proteins only. |
Protein Availability for Identification | Incapacity to identify all potential antigens. | All proteins can theoretically be identified. |
Types of Protein Antigens Identified | More abundant antigens that can be purified in quantities suitable for vaccine testing. | Every single possible protein that can be expressed. |
Types of Pathogens | Some pathogens are too difficult and/or dangerous to cultivate in the laboratory. | Subunit vaccines can potentially be developed for any pathogen with a genome sequence. |
Antigen Verification | Experimental verification. | Computational verification. |
Timing | Time-consuming laboratory procedures. | Less time-consuming. |
Accuracy | Identification of antigens is experimentally observed. | Accuracy is dependent on the quality of genome sequences and the accuracy of programs. |
Cost | Expensive. | Relatively inexpensive. |
Immunotherapy and reverse vaccinology represent significant advancements in the field of medicine, offering new avenues for the prevention and treatment of diseases. Immunotherapy harnesses the power of the immune system to combat cancer and other diseases by either stimulating or suppressing immune responses. Reverse vaccinology uses genomic information to identify potential vaccine candidates more efficiently and effectively, making it a versatile and cost-effective approach to vaccine development. As research and technology continue to advance, these approaches are expected to play increasingly important roles in improving global health outcomes, providing new hope for combating some of the most challenging diseases.
These innovations underscore the importance of continued investment in medical research and technology. By leveraging the body's natural defenses and the wealth of genetic information available, immunotherapy and reverse vaccinology hold the promise of more effective, targeted, and personalized treatments and vaccines, ultimately leading to better health and quality of life for people worldwide.
Mitra A, Kumar A, Amdare NP, Pathak R. Current Landscape of Cancer Immunotherapy: Harnessing the Immune Arsenal to Overcome Immune Evasion. Biology (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;13(5):307.
Gupta SL, Basu S, Soni V, Jaiswal RK. Immunotherapy: an alternative promising therapeutic approach against cancers. Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Oct;49(10):9903-9913.
Naran K, Nundalall T, Chetty S, Barth S. Principles of Immunotherapy: Implications for Treatment Strategies in Cancer and Infectious Diseases. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3158.
Khalid K, Poh CL. The Promising Potential of Reverse Vaccinology-Based Next-Generation Vaccine Development over Conventional Vaccines against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Vaccines. 2023;11(7):1264.
Ventola CL. Cancer Immunotherapy, Part 1: Current Strategies and Agents. P T. 2017 Jun;42(6):375-383.
Cancer.gov. Immunotherapy to Treat Cancer [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/types/immunotherapy
Physio-pedia. Immunotherapy [Internet]. Available from: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Immunotherapy
ScienceDirect. Immunotherapy [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/immunotherapy
Papaioannou NE, Beniata OV, Vitsos P, Tsitsilonis O, Samara P. Harnessing the immune system to improve cancer therapy. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Jul;4(14):261.
Cancer Research Institute. What is Immunotherapy? [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cancerresearch.org/what-is-immunotherapy
Kciuk M, Yahya EB, Mohamed Ibrahim MM, Rashid S, Iqbal MO, Kontek R, et al. Recent Advances in Molecular Mechanisms of Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 11;15(10):2721.
Vanneman M, Dranoff G. Combining immunotherapy and targeted therapies in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar 22;12(4):237-51.