This study was conducted in the field of poultry in the Department of Animal Production, College of Agriculture, University of Diyala for the period from 1/10/2022 to 4/11/2022 in order to find out the effect of adding sodium citrate to drinking. Water on the Histological and microbial count of rose 308 broiler chickens reared at different densities. 405 day-old unsexed hybrid broiler birds, randomly distributed to nine treatments, with three replicates for each treatment, with three different densities and two different concentrations of sodium citrate were used. The results showed a significant (p≤0.05) superiority in Histological and microbial count of birds that were fed sodium citrate and reared at different densities. compared to the control treatment (without addition). An improvement was observed in Total and Lacto bacteria within the parts of the intestine represented by the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, as well as in the length and thickness of the villi and the depth of the crypts of the parts of the intestine represented by the duodenum, jejunum and ileum compared to the control treatment.
Natural acids are powerless and can't be totally isolated and the majority of these acids have antimicrobial action [1]. Natural acids were chosen as promising food added substances in poultry creation because of their capacity to keep up with the trustworthiness of the gastrointestinal cell layer, diminish the quantity of destructive microorganisms, work on the pace of processing and food retention and add to working on useful execution [2,3]. Concentrates on natural acids affirmed that blending at least two natural acids works on the useful execution and resistance of birds better compared to any corrosive added to the eating routine alone [4].
Citrus extract is quite possibly of the most broadly consumed natural corrosive on the planet, which has prompted a colossal business interest in it as well as prodding researchers to find new predominant creation strategies [5]. Citrus extract (CA) is a Krebs-cycle corrosive with a chain of six carbon particles (C6) found by the Swedish scientist Carl Wilhelm Scheele in 1784 through his crystallization of lemon juice [6]. CA's name comes from the Latin word citrus, a tree got normally from citrus products of the soil [7].
CA and its salts assume a significant part in energy digestion PP keeping up with gastrointestinal homeostasis and epithelial honesty, taking part in the safe reaction, decreasing aggravation and diminishing oxidative pressure in poultry [8-11].
Citrus extract (CA) is a feeble natural corrosive that makes different antibacterial impacts, contingent upon the pKa worth of the corrosive and the gastrointestinal pH [12], that cause the demise of unsafe microorganisms in the stomach of creatures [13]. What's more, the antibacterial movement of CA makes an acidic state in the stomach (pH 3.5-4.0), which represses the development of Salmonella Escherichia coli and other corrosive prejudiced Gram-negative microorganisms in the gastrointestinal system of birds [14]. Its component of activity is by actuating proteolytic proteins and decreasing the gamble of disease [15].
This study was directed in the field of poultry in the Division of Creature Creation/School of Farming/College of Diyala for the period from 10/1/2022 to 11/4/2022 for a time of 35 days. The impact of adding sodium citrate to water on the useful and physiological execution of grills has been considered.
In the examination, 405 unsexed, one-day-old 308 Rose chickens were utilized, haphazardly dispersed to nine medicines, with three replications for every treatment, with three distinct densities and the utilization of two unique centralizations of sodium citrate. The medicines are as per the following:
T1: It was benefited from a standard eating regimen and normal water at a thickness of 12 fowl/m2
T2: They were benefited from a standard eating regimen and water to which 1.5 g/l of sodium citrate was added, at a thickness of 12 birds/m2
T3: They were benefited from a standard eating routine and water to which 3 g/l of sodium citrate was added, at a thickness of 12 birds/m2
T4: Control treatment and benefited from standard eating routine and normal water at a thickness of 15 birds/m2
T5: They were benefited from a standard eating regimen and water to which 1.5 g/L of sodium citrate was added, at a thickness of 15 birds/m2
T6: They were benefited from a standard eating routine and water to which 3 g/l of sodium citrate was added, at a thickness of 15 birds/m2
T7: Control treatment and benefited from standard eating regimen and ordinary water at a thickness of 18 birds/m2
T8: It was benefited from a standard eating regimen and water to which 1.5 g/l of sodium citrate was added, at a thickness of 18 birds/m2
T9: They were benefited from a standard eating regimen and water to which 3 g/l of sodium citrate was added, at a thickness of 18 birds/m2 (Table 1)
A factorial experiment using Complete Randomize Design (CRD) in analyzing the data between the treatments. Significant differences between the means of the treatments were measured using the Duncan test at the level of significance of 0.05. The ready-made statistical program SAS [16] was used to analyze the data.
Microbial Traits
One gram was taken from the jejunum of each bird of the three slaughtered birds for each treatment at the age of 35 days and it was added to the physiological saline solution in a volume of 9 mL under sterile conditions and decimal dilutions were made from it up to a dilution of 5-10 to estimate the numbers of the following bacteria:
Total bacteria preparation
Preparation of E. coli bacteria
Preparation of Lactobacillus bacteria
The Spread Plating Method was used according to the method of Samanta et al. [17], by using Nutrient Agar to estimate the number of total bacteria, Mac Con Key Agar to estimate the number of coliform bacteria and MRS Agar to estimate the number of lactic acid bacteria, through transfer 0.1 mL of each decimal diluent by a sterile pipette (Micropipet) into each two dishes of Petri dishes prepared in advance from the special culture medium for each of them and spread on the surface of the solidified medium by means of a sterile hooked glass rod resembling the large letter L, then the special dishes were incubated for total aerobic bacteria and bacteria coli in an inverted manner at 37°C for 24 hours, while the dishes for lactic acid bacteria were incubated upside down and away from air at a temperature of 37°C for 48 hours and the growing colonies were counted in each of the three media, by selecting a culture plate that is good for growing the number of colonies from each two dishes for each decimal dilution and the numbers of colony forming units (cfu) were calculated and multiplied by the inverse of the dilution to obtain the number of bacterial colonies per gram of the fasting sample and the concentrations of these bacteria were converted to logarithmic numbers to the base (10) and expressed as log 10 and mt/g.
Table 1: Components and Chemical Analysis of the Diets Used in the Experiment
Fodder Material | Starter Bush (1-14 days) (%) | Growing Ration (15-28 days) (%) | Final Ration (29-35 days) (%) |
Yellow corn | 52 | 55 | 57.5 |
Soybean meal* | 41 | 36 | 33 |
Premix** | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Sun flower oil | 3 | 4.5 | 5 |
Dicalcium phosphate | 1.5 | 1 | 1 |
Total summation | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Computed Chemical Analysis*** | |||
Crude protein (%) | 23.16 | 21.25 | 20.1 |
Represented energy (kcal/kg) | 2983 | 3095 | 3168 |
Methionine (%) | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.52 |
Methionine and cysteine (%) | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
Lysine (%) | 1.39 | 1.40 | 1.19 |
Calcium (%) | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.8 |
Available phosphorus (%) | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.38 |
*Soybean meal of Argentine origin contained 44% crude protein and 2230 kilocalories/kg represented energy, **Ingredients of the AGRO HEALTH 2.5 premix produced by WAFI International Company, containing protein 29.50%, energy 1817 Kcal/kg, lysine 11.70%, methionine 10.40%, methionine+cysteine 10.46%, available phosphorus 12.90%, sodium 5.30%, calcium 6.40% with a range of vitamins and mineral elements, ***According to the chemical composition according to the analyzes of the feed materials included in the reports of the US National Research Council N.R.C
Histological Qualities
The small intestine was extracted from the slaughtered birds after it was cut from the beginning of its connection with the gizzard until the end of its connection with the two caecum [18], where the parts of the intestine (duodenum, jejunum and ileum) were cut about 2 cm from each part and preserved in formalin at a concentration of 10% and measurements were taken The height and thickness of the villi and the depth of the crypts of the parts of the intestine.
For the effect of the overlap between different breeding densities and the addition of sodium citrate at two levels on Ross 308 broilers for a periodof 1-35 days on the total bacteria inside the intestinal parts, represented by the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, there are significant differences in the quality of preparation of TOTAL bacteria in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, as the third treatment of the duodenum, which did not differ significantly from the 6 and 9 and the jejunum, which did not differ significantly from transactions 2, 5, 6, 9 and the ninth treatmentof alfaifi, which did notdiffer significantly from transactions 2, 3, 5, 6, recorded the highest number of bacteria, which amounted to 1347, 1331.66 and 1393, respectively, compared to the fourth and seventh treatment of duodenum, which recorded the lowest number of bacteria, 784 and 782.66, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2: The Effect of the Interaction Between Different Breeding Densities and the Addition of Sodium Citrate At Several Levels on Ross 308 Broilers for a Period of 1-35 Days on TOTAL Bacteria Inside the Parts of the Intestine Represented by the Duodenum, Jejunum And Ileum (Mean±Standard error)
Treatments | Parts of the intestine | Duodenum | Jejunum | Ileum |
1 | Total | 964.66±29.98d | 940.67±41.76c | 947.66±18.58c |
2 | 1285.66±29.16b | 1286.67±27.06ab | 1275.67±11.89ab | |
3 | 1347±33.32a | 1331.66±31.93a | 1306±18.50ab | |
4 | 784±54.003e | 893.66±1.20d | 924±38.15c | |
5 | 1202±23.57c | 1267±30.74ab | 1290.33±19.36ab | |
6 | 1284±10.06ab | 1282±19.00ab | 1355±33.77ab | |
7 | 782.66±32.68e | 891±56.09d | 867.66±37.30d | |
8 | 1142.66±7.42c | 1203.33±22.58b | 1240.66±67.15b | |
9 | 1263±23.71ab | 1278±60.77ab | 1393±62.29a | |
Moral level |
| ** | ** | ** |
For the effect of the overlap between different breeding densities and the addition of sodium citrate at several levels on Ross 308 broilers for a period of 1-35 days on lactobacilli bacteria inside the intestinal parts, represented by the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, there are significant differences in the character of the preparation of LACTO bacteria in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, as the second and third treatment of the duodenum, which did not differ significantly from treatments 6, 9 and the third it did not differ significantly from transactions 2, 5, 6 and the third and sixth treatment of alfifei, which did not differ significantly from transactions 2, 5, 9 and recorded the highest number of beneficial bacteria amounted to 1013.67, 1045.66, 1038.33, 1004.66 and 1027, respectively, compared with the seventh treatment for duodenal and fasting, which recorded the lowest number of bacteria amounted to 436 and 453, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3: The Effect of the Interaction Between Different Breeding Densities and the Addition of Sodium Citrate at Several Levels on Ross 308 Broilers for a Period of 1-35 Days on LACTO Bacteria Inside the Parts of the Intestine Represented by the Duodenum, Jejunum and Ileum (Mean±Standard error)
Treatments | Parts of the Intestine | Duodenum | Jejunum | Ileum |
1 | LACTO | 556.66±25.14d | 562±29.28d | 547.66±25.69c |
2 | 1013.67±26.17a | 1025.33±34.66ab | 995.66±44.09ab | |
3 | 1045.66±33.54a | 1038.33±26.71a | 1004.66±17.36a | |
4 | 498.67±22.70de | 500.33±11.83de | 526.66±11.39c | |
5 | 914±27.05bc | 965.33±15.21abc | 978.33±17.70ab | |
6 | 982.66±19.64ab | 983.33±31.25ab | 1027±31.78a | |
7 | 436±14.42e | 453±21.03e | 464.33±22.42c | |
8 | 865.33±12.71c | 883.33±33.59c | 902±44.38b | |
9 | 976±34.01ab | 941.33±25.33bc | 1058.33±38.60ab | |
Moral level |
| ** | ** | ** |
It is noted from Table 4, for the effect of interference between different breeding densities and the addition of sodium citrate at two levels on Ross 308 broilers for a period of 1-35 days on E. coli bacteria inside the intestinal parts, represented by the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, there are significant differences in the quality of preparation of E. coli bacteria in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, as the second and eighth treatment of the duodenum, the third treatment of the harmful bacteria reached 272, 277.33, 293.33, 280, 301.33 and 312 compared to the first treatment for duodenitis and the first, fourth and seventh treatment for fasting and the first and seventh treatment, which reached the highest numbers of harmful bacteria amounted to 408, 378.66, 393.33, 438, 400 and 403.33, respectively.
Table 4: The Effect of the Interaction Between Different Breeding Densities and the Addition of Sodium Citrate at Several Levels on Ross 308 Broilers for a Period of 1-35 days on E. coli Bacteria Inside the Parts of the Intestine Represented by the Duodenum, Jejunum and Ileum (Mean±Standard error)
Treatments | Parts of the Intestine | Duodenum | Jejunum | Ileum |
1 | E. coli | 408±16.65c | 378.66±42.91c | 400±9.24c |
2 | 272±24.44a | 328±28.84B | 280±44.54A | |
3 | 301.33±17.48ba | 293.33±13.33a | 301.33±2.66A | |
4 | 285.33±32.76ba | 393.33±10.66c | 397.33±39.28Ab | |
5 | 288±8ba | 301.66±17.28B | 312±4.61A | |
6 | 301.33±9.61ba | 298.66±14.11ba | 328±16.65Ba | |
7 | 346.66±19.22B | 438±40.26c | 403.33±36.37C | |
8 | 277.33±13.33a | 320±48.88B | 338.66±22.78B | |
9 | 287±11.93Ba | 337.33±35.50B | 334.66±23.70B | |
Moral level |
| ** | ** | ** |
It is noted from Table 5, the effect of interference between different breeding densities and the addition of sodium citrate at two levels for Ross 308 broilers for a period of 1-35 days along the villi of the intestinal parts, represented by the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, the presence of significant differences in the quality of the length of the villi of the said intestinal parts, as the sixth and ninth treatment of the duodenum, the eighth treatment of the fasting and the third treatment of 2122.56, 1766.47 and 1920.54, respectively, compared with the first treatment of the duodenum, the first treatment of the fasting and the seventh treatment of the ileum, which recorded the lowest length of villi of the intestinal segments, amounting to 569.96, 405.97 and 419.73, respectively.
Table 5: The Effect of the Interaction Between Different Breeding Densities and the Addition of Sodium Citrate at Several Levels on Ross 308 Broilers for a Period of 1-35 Days on the Length of the Villi of the Parts of the Intestine Represented by the Duodenum, Jejunum and Ileum (Mean±Standard error)
Treatments | Parts of the Intestine | Duodenum | Jejunum | Ileum |
1 | Villi length | 569.96±0.63d | 405.97±0.17i | 537.04±0.13g |
2 | 1376.45±1.09bc | 1240.27±5.17e | 1026.29±1.75f | |
3 | 1200.64±0.75c | 1230.42±1.26f | 1920.54±0.57a | |
4 | 565.52±0.29d | 500±1.17g | 439.48±9.75h | |
5 | 1539.28±276.49b | 1638.94±0.39c | 1618.73±0.37d | |
6 | 2091.70±0.31a | 1274.34±0.22d | 1284.27±0.27e | |
7 | 579.72±7.06d | 488.77±0.45h | 419.73±0.46i | |
8 | 1600.22±1.49b | 1766.47±0.98a | 1783.70±1.19c | |
9 | 2122.56±1.33a | 1697.59±1.71b | 1840.18±2.71b | |
Moral level |
| ** | ** | ** |
For the effect of the overlap between different breeding densities and the addition of sodium citrate at two levels on Ross 308 broilers for a period of 1-35 days on the thickness of the villi of the intestinal parts, represented by the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, there are significant differences in the thickness of the villi of the said intestinal parts, as the eighth treatment of the duodenum, the second treatment of the fasting and the fifth treatment of the ileum, which recorded the highest thickness of villi of the intestinal parts amounted to 184.85, 244.51 and 190.03, respectively, compared with the first treatment for the duodenum, the seventh for the fasting and the first for the alfaifi, which recorded the lowest villus thickness of 55.34 (Table 6).
Table 6: The Effect of the Interaction Between Different Breeding Densities and the Addition of Sodium Citrate at Several Levels on Ross 308 Broilers for a Period of 1-35 Days on the Thickness of the Villi of the Parts of the Intestine Represented by the Duodenum, Jejunum and Ileum (Mean±Standard error)
Treatments | Parts of the Intestine | Duodenum | Jejunum | Ileum |
1 | Villous thickness | 55.34±0.28 i | 84.12±0.16 f | 79.47±1.37 f |
2 | 104.93±0.08 f | 244.51±0.37 a | 114.06±0.18 e | |
3 | 154.82±0.28 c | 145.22±0.67 b | 126.65±0.36 c | |
4 | 127.96±1.04 d | 107.90±3.09 d | 115.52±0.32 e | |
5 | 159.76±0.37 b | 142.86±0.17 b | 190.03±0.23 a | |
6 | 158.73±0.27 b | 136.10±0.25 c | 170.97±0.19 b | |
7 | 88.97±0.44 g | 80.59±0.47 g | 72.26±0.45 h | |
8 | 184.85±0.46 a | 138.00±0.63 c | 117.96±0.73 d | |
9 | 172.95±1.02 ab | 90.38±0.95 e | 174.24±0.62 b | |
Moral level |
| ** | ** | ** |
For the effect of the overlap between different breeding densities and the addition of sodium citrate at several levels on Ross 308 broilers for a period of 1-35 days on the depth of crypts of the intestinal parts, represented by the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, there are significant differences in the quality of the depth of crypts of the said intestinal parts, as the second treatment of the duodenum, fasting and ileum, which recorded the highest depth of crypts amounted to 282.52, 284.57 and 316.65, respectively, compared to with the seventh treatment of the duodenum for the Faifi and the first treatment for the fasting, which recorded the lowest hidden depth of 73.42, respectively (Table 7).
Table 7: The Effect of the Interaction Between Different Breeding Densities and the Addition of Sodium Citrate at Several Levels on Ross 308 Broilers for a Period of 1-35 Days on the Depth of the Crypts of the Parts of the Intestine Represented by the Duodenum, Jejunum and Ileum (Mean±Standard error)
Treatments | Parts of the Intestine | Duodenum | Jejunum | Ileum |
1 | The depth of the crypts | 125.08±015f | 50.71±0.19g | 69.37±0.22h |
2 | 282.52±1.09a | 284.57±0.61a | 316.65±0.61a | |
3 | 200.82±045b | 150.37±0.41b | 121.93±032f | |
4 | 137.19±1.93e | 113.03±5.62e | 107.33±3.72g | |
5 | 158.82±03d | 123.23±0.44d | 176.82±0.25d | |
6 | 175.44±0.3c | 136.12±0.27c | 163.48±0.23e | |
7 | 88.84±0.49g | 75.58±0.49f | 73.42±0.43h | |
8 | 123.34±1.20f | 119.99±1.25d | 205.46±1.00b | |
9 | 176.50±2.07c | 172.51±2.05 | 183.66±1.48c | |
Moral level |
| ** | ** | ** |
From the results of the beneficial qualities in this review, it is noted that the expansion of sodium citrate, whether in feed or water, mainly affected its improvement and the justification for this improvement may be that the expansion of natural acids tries to reduce the pH in the frame related to the stomach, which gives a reasonable climate To formulate pepsin catalyst and thus expands the dissociation of proteins into amino acids, which leads to more advanced processing and retention of supplements, attempts to keep up the credibility of films and the wall of the gastrointestinal tract, increase profitable microorganisms and achieve microbial balance and improve the rate of digestion and absorption of nutrients and thus contribute to the improvement of productive performance for poultry [2,19-24].
When birds are fed organic acids, this leads to a decrease in the pH of the gut of poultry, which reduces pathogenic bacteria and improves gut morphology and microbial balance. In this way, further development of the assimilation limit of enteric supplements in the gastric framework, further development of gastrointestinal processing and retention, expansion of the amount of supplement consumed [25,26] and the addition of Sodium Citrate (SC) in the diet of birds domestic animals has strong antibiotic effects. Oxidative stress inhibits many harmful microorganisms [27]. The end result is an improved productive performance of the organic acid-fed birds.
Makki, M.A. Effective Management of the Digestive System in Poultry (Problems and Solutions), 2020.
Nguyen, D.H. and I.H. Kim. "Protected Organic Acids Improved Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Decreased Gas Emission in Broilers." Animals, vol. 10, 2020.
Dai, D. et al. "Organic Acids as Alternatives for Antibiotic Growth Promoters Alter the Intestinal Structure and Microbiota and Improve the Growth Performance in Broilers." Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 11, 2020.
Gao, C.Q. et al. "Dietary Supplementation with Acidifiers Improves the Growth Performance, Meat Quality and Intestinal Health of Broiler Chickens." Animal Nutrition, vol. 7, 2021, pp. 762-769.
Hu, W. et al. "Current Strategies and Future Prospects for Enhancing Microbial Production of Citric Acid." Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 103, 2019, pp. 201-209.
Eli̇Uz, E. "Antimicrobial Activity of Citric Acid against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans as a Sanitizer Agent." Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, vol. 8, 2020, pp. 295-301.
Karaffa, L. and C.P. Kubicek. "Citric Acid and Itaconic Acid Accumulation: Variations of the Same Story?" Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 103, 2019, pp. 2889-2902.
Liao, H. et al. "The Effect of Citric Acid Acidification of Drinking Water on Growth Performance, Cecal pH, and Cecal Microflora of Meat Duck." Livestock Science, vol. 209, 2018, pp. 54-59.
Pearlin, B.V. et al. "Role of Acidifiers in Livestock Nutrition and Health: A Review." Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, vol. 104, 2020, pp. 558-569.
Coutzac, C. et al. "Systemic Short Chain Fatty Acids Limit Antitumor Effect of CTLA-4 Blockade in Hosts with Cancer." Nature Communications, vol. 11, 2020, Article 2168.
Kallam, N.R.K. and V. Sejian. "Gut Health and Immunity in Improving Poultry Production." Advances in Poultry Nutrition Research, Edited by Patra, A.K., IntechOpen, 2021.
Nguyen, D.H. et al. "Organic Acids Mixture as a Dietary Additive for Pigs-A Review." Animals, vol. 10, 2020.
Deepa, K. et al. "Butyric Acid as an Antibiotic Substitute for Broiler Chicken-A Review." Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, vol. 6, 2018, pp. 63-69.
Chowdhury, R. et al. "Effect of Citric Acid, Avilamycin, and Their Combination on the Performance, Tibia Ash, and Immune Status of Broilers." Poultry Science, vol. 88, 2009, pp. 1616-1622.
Shah, S.Z.H. et al. "Prospects of Using Citric Acid as Poultry Feed Supplements." Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, vol. 28, 2018, p. 12.
SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide: Statistics Version 6.12ed. SAS Institute Inc., 2001.
Samanta, S. et al. "Comparative Efficacy of an Organic Acid Blend and Bacitracin Methylene Disalicylate as Growth Promoters in Broiler Chickens: Effects on Performance, Gut Histology, and Small Intestinal Milieu." Veterinary Medicine International, 2010.
Salahi, A. "Effect of In Ovo Administration of Butyric Acid into Broiler Breeder Eggs on Chicken Small Intestine pH and Morphology." Slovak Journal of Animal Science, vol. 48, no. 1, 2015, pp. 8-15.
Adil, S. et al. "Response of Broiler Chicken to Dietary Supplementation of Organic Acids." Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 3, 2011, pp. 498-508.
Haq, Z. et al. "Advances in Role of Organic Acids in Poultry Nutrition: A Review." Journal of Applied and Natural Science, vol. 9, no. 4, 2017, pp. 2152-2157.
Dittoe, D.K. et al. "Organic Acids and Potential for Modifying the Avian Gastrointestinal Tract and Reducing Pathogens and Disease." Frontiers in Veterinary Science, vol. 5, 2018, pp. 216-228.
Vieco-Saiz, N. et al. "Benefits and Inputs from Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins as Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters during Food-Animal Production." Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, 2019, pp. 57-64.
Aristimunha, P.C. et al. "Effect of Dietary Organic Acids and Hemic Substance Supplementation on Performance, Immune Response, and Gut Morphology of Broiler Chickens." Journal of Applied Poultry Research, vol. 29, no. 1, 2020, pp. 85-94.
Kalafova, A., et al. "Metabolic Effect of Citric Acid in Broiler Chickens." Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, vol. 9, no. 5, 2020, pp. 110-112.
Yenice, G. et al. "Effect of Kefir upon the Performance, Intestinal Microflora and Histopathology of Certain Organs in Laying Hens." Kafkas University Veterinary Faculty Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, 2014, pp. 363-370.
Mikulski, D. et al. "Effects of Dietary Probiotic (Pediococcus acidilactici) Supplementation on Productive Performance, Egg Quality, and Body Composition in Laying Hens Fed Diets Varying in Energy Density." Poultry Science, vol. 99, 2020, pp. 2275-2285.
Ponrajan, A. et al. "Effect of Sodium Citrate Plus Sodium Diacetate or Buffered Vinegar on Quality Attributes of Enhanced Beef Top Sirloins." Meat Science, vol. 91, 2012, pp. 43-49.