<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iajabms</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IAJABMS</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IAJABMS</journal-id><issn>2709-3298</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47310/iajabms.2025.v06i01.004</article-id><title-group><article-title>Knocked Out or Conscious? Myths and Facts About Anesthesia Among Shimla’s Public</article-title></title-group><abstract>Background: Anesthesia has transformed modern medicine by enabling painless surgical and diagnostic procedures. However, public understanding of its types, safety, and administration remains clouded by myths and misconceptions-especially in semi-urban and rural regions like Shimla. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear, poor compliance, and hesitancy to consent, thereby affecting perioperative outcomes. Materials and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 adults in Shimla between October and December 2024. Participants were selected using purposive and convenience sampling across both urban and rural settings. A structured, pre-tested questionnaire in Hindi and English assessed socio-demographics, knowledge of anesthesia, and prevailing misconceptions. Each correct response earned one point, with scores categorized into Very Good (&amp;gt;80%), Good (60-79%), Fair (41-59%), and Poor (&amp;lt;40%). Data were analyzed using SPSS v26.0. Results: Out of 400 respondents, the majority were aged 26-35 years (34.8%), with 52% female and 55.3% from rural areas. While 78.5% correctly identified anesthesiologists as the primary providers of anesthesia and 76.8% knew patients do not feel pain under general anesthesia, several myths persisted-such as anesthesia being instantly reversible (66.5%) or always requiring a breathing tube (68.3%). Overall, 38.3% demonstrated Very Good knowledge, 41.3% Good, 15.5% Fair, and 5.0% Poor knowledge. The findings revealed substantial awareness alongside notable gaps in understanding more nuanced aspects of anesthesia. Conclusion: Public awareness in Shimla regarding anesthesia is encouraging, but significant misconceptions remain-particularly concerning safety, effects, and procedural details. Targeted educational efforts, improved provider-patient communication, and community-based awareness initiatives are essential to bridge these gaps and promote informed, confident decision-making around anesthesia.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>