<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iarjms</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IARJMS</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IARJMS</journal-id><issn>2708-3594</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjms.2021.v02i01.009</article-id><title-group><article-title>Neuro-COVID is more widespread than assumed</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>Finsterer</given-names><surname>J</surname></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff-id id="aff-a" /><abstract>With interest we read the article by Pergolizzi et al. about a systematic review about the neurological manifestations of patients with COVID-19 [1]. It was concluded that SARS-CoV-2 enters the brain via ACE2-receptors, that neurological disease only rarely precedes the onset of pulmonary manifestations of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, that patients with pre-existing neurological conditions are at an increased risk of experiencing COVID-19 associated neurological abnormalities, that particularly patients with severe COVID-19 are at an increased risk of experiencing neurological disease, that drugs suppressing the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 are contraindicated for treating neurological involvement and that the neurological disease in COVID-19 patients may be easily missed [1]. We have the following comments and concerns.&amp;nbsp;The main shortcoming of the review is that it is highly speculative. There is no study available which clearly indicates that patients with pre-existing neurological disease are at an increased risk during a SARS-CoV-2 infection of developing additional neurological compromise. Entrance of SARS-CoV-2 2 to the brain via ACE2-receptors also remains unproven. There is no evidence available that particularly patients with severe infection are at an increased risk of experiencing neurological complications.&amp;nbsp;The authors do not mention a number of potential neurological manifestation of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities not included were sinus venous thrombosis, intracerebral bleeding, subarachnoid bleeding, acute, haemorrhagic, necrotic encephalopathy (AHNE), acute demyelinating encephalo-myelitis (ADEM), vasoconstriction syndrome, pituitary apoplexies’, psychosis, Parkinson’s disease, myelitis and plexitis [2-4]. Among the peripheral nervous system (PNS) abnormalities associated with SARS-CoV-2 the authors did not discuss dysgeusia, myasthenic syndrome, myositis, rhabdomyolysis and myasthenia [5].&amp;nbsp;Missing in the review is a discussion about secondary neurological compromise in COVID-19 patients due to side effects of drugs given to treat COVID-19. These drugs include chloroquine, azithromycin, steroids and others.&amp;nbsp;Overall, the review by Pergolizzi et al. has some limitations which should be met before drawing final conclusions. There is a need for prospective studies on the neurological involvement in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Neurological side effects of drugs given to treat COVID-19 should be included in a review about neurological disease in COVID-19.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>