<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iarjs</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IARJS</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IARJS</journal-id><issn>2789-6102</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjs.2022.v02i02.004</article-id><title-group><article-title>Surgical Management of Secondary Peritonitis Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>Preet</given-names><surname>Thakur</surname></name></contrib><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-a" /></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>U. K.</given-names><surname>Chandel</surname></name></contrib><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-b" /></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>A. K.</given-names><surname>Kaundal</surname></name></contrib><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-c" /></contrib-group><aff-id id="aff-a">Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, I.G.M.C. Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India</aff-id><aff-id id="aff-b">Professor, Department of General Surgery, I.G.M.C. Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India</aff-id><aff-id id="aff-c">Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, I.G.M.C. Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India</aff-id><abstract>Background: In the majority of general surgical units around the world, Secondary Peritonitis&amp;nbsp;is the common surgical emergency and has high risk of morbidity and mortality. The present study was done to evaluate the surgical&amp;nbsp;management among Secondary Peritonitis cases in a tertiary care Hospital. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted by Department of Surgery, IGMC, Shimla over a period of twelve months from January 2021 – December 2021 among patients with a diagnosis of secondary peritonitis after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant information was collected and further analysed by using IBM SPSS Statistics. Results: A total of 250 individuals with a diagnosis of perforation peritonitis were assessed in the current study. Males made up 205 (82%) of the total while females made up 45 (18%). The patients' average age was 47.28 17.34 years, ranging from 18 to 87. In the study, 99 (39.6%) of the total patients were under the age of 40, while 151 (60.4%) were beyond the age of 40. Of the total, 32 (12.80%) passed away while 218 (87.20%) were discharged after receiving treatment. In the present study, most of patients 89(35.6%) of&amp;nbsp;secondary peritonitis were managed by Cellan jones repair followed by Loop ileostomy in 43(17.2%) patients End ileostomy in 27 (10.8%) patients and rest by other procedures. Conclusion: The study concluded that most of patients of&amp;nbsp;secondary peritonitis were managed by Cellan jones repair followed by Loop ileostomy and End ileostomy.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>