<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Research Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iarjtbm</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IARJTBM</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IARJTBM</journal-id><issn>2789-6021</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjtbm.2022.v02i01.003</article-id><title-group><article-title>Sustainability thought 159: How can the general irresponsible market structure, irresponsible population dynamics and irresponsible system stability framework be used to point out the embedded neutrality assumptions under which irresponsible population dynamics frameworks like the ecological overshoot work?</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>Lucio</given-names><surname>Muñoz</surname></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff-id id="aff-a" /><abstract>It can be said that the irresponsible market structure-irresponsible population and irresponsible system stability framework allows for a systematic view of the system stability issue from root causality, to consequences, to irresponsible impacts on system stability, if the nature of root causality is irresponsible.&amp;nbsp; In other words, this framework provides a full view of the system stability issue.&amp;nbsp;If we look carefully at population dynamic and system stability frameworks like the ecological overshoot we can see that it says nothing about the irresponsible market structure(pricing, consumption, and production) that shapes irresponsible populations like over population so it is not a full population dynamics and system stability based framework.&amp;nbsp; In other words, as this framework is driven by over population dynamics, an irresponsible population dynamics, it provides a partial view of the system stability issue as it has an irresponsible market structure neutrality assumptions.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Hence, ecological overshoot based framework needs the existence of one specific embedded neutrality assumptions in order to work; and without this assumption the framework would not work as then the nature of root causality and of consequences and of irresponsible impacts on system stability would change, yet this situation seems unclear right now and needs some good food for thoughts on how that embedded assumption can be seen and understood.&amp;nbsp; And this raises important questions such as How can the general irresponsible market structure, irresponsible population dynamics and irresponsible system stability framework be used to point out the embedded neutrality assumptions under which irresponsible population dynamics frameworks like the ecological overshoot work? What are the implications of eliminating this embedded assumption?&amp;nbsp; Among the goals of this paper is to provide an answer to those questions.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>