<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="Review Article" dtd-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">iarjmcr</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed">IARJMCR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IARJMCR</journal-id><issn>2709-3220</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjmcr.2021.v02i02.019</article-id><title-group><article-title>A Brief Review of Different Techniques to Treat Calcified Coronary Lesions</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>Usman</given-names><surname>Sarwar</surname></name></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><given-names>Hassan</given-names><surname>Tahir</surname></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff-id id="aff-a" /><abstract>Calcified coronary artery lesions, especially with severe calcification, are challenging to intervene due to difficulty in deploying coronary stents and their full expansion. Different studies have shown that the calcified lesion is associated with increased mortality and a lower rate of complete revascularization. [6,7]&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Different treatment modalities that evolve over time are currently available ranging from non-compliant balloon angioplasty to the newer addition of intravascular lithotripsy to tackle this challenging clinical entity. In this article, we reviewed different options available to treat coronary calcium.</abstract></article-meta></front><body /><back /></article>